All right, that's it. I'm going on record as saying I'm sick and friggin' tired of hearing people say "BUSH LIED!" Get it straight, people. Use your Webster...it's there for a reason. For Bush to lie, he would have had to have known that Sadaam had no WMD's. This in itself would be really strange; if Saddam didn't have any WMD's, why wouldn't have he had made this clear to the UN instead of acting like a belligerent warlord? At any rate...if Bush KNEW that Saddam had no WMD's, then it would make no sense for him to base the invasion of Iraq on that one issue alone. It would immediately become apparent that there had been no WMD's and his reasoning would be revealed as faulty. This is beyond the scope of even the horrible kind of president Bush has been made out to be by the Angry Left.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that Bush didn't know that there would be no IMMEDIATE evidence of weapons of mass destruction. This does not mean that he lied; it means that he made a mistake. I know, I hear you laughing...a BIG mistake. Perhaps. I haven't given up yet. At any rate...remember, it's the eponymy, stupid.